in duckworth v. eagan (1988), the supreme court held that the police\n○ had been too harshly burdened by the…

in duckworth v. eagan (1988), the supreme court held that the police\n○ had been too harshly burdened by the miranda decision and no longer had to follow it.\n○ could create their own miranda warning if it communicated the same message.\n○ did not need to read the miranda warning if they considered a suspect to be dangerous.\n○ could create any warning they chose so long as they got a conviction.

in duckworth v. eagan (1988), the supreme court held that the police\n○ had been too harshly burdened by the miranda decision and no longer had to follow it.\n○ could create their own miranda warning if it communicated the same message.\n○ did not need to read the miranda warning if they considered a suspect to be dangerous.\n○ could create any warning they chose so long as they got a conviction.

Answer

Explanations: In Duckworth v. Eagan (1988), the Supreme Court ruled that as long as the police communication conveyed the essential rights (similar to the Miranda warning), they could use their own wording. The key was the substance of the message, not the exact phrasing of the traditional Miranda warning.

Answer:

could create their own Miranda warning if it communicated the same message.