evaluating a claim\nimagine that you are writing an argument for schools to provide cash bonuses for…

evaluating a claim\nimagine that you are writing an argument for schools to provide cash bonuses for students who achieve all as in a semester. which claim is the most logical?\nall students deserve the right to earn money for their work.\nstudents who earn cash for good grades will go on to have successful careers.\nproviding students with a cash incentive could lead teens to be more motivated and successful.\ncash incentives will never work because students who are intrinsically motivated are more successful in life.

evaluating a claim\nimagine that you are writing an argument for schools to provide cash bonuses for students who achieve all as in a semester. which claim is the most logical?\nall students deserve the right to earn money for their work.\nstudents who earn cash for good grades will go on to have successful careers.\nproviding students with a cash incentive could lead teens to be more motivated and successful.\ncash incentives will never work because students who are intrinsically motivated are more successful in life.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • The first option is too broad as it doesn't specifically relate to the context of achieving all As.
  • The second option makes an unsubstantiated leap from earning cash for grades to having successful careers.
  • The fourth option is a negative claim that goes against the purpose of arguing for cash bonuses.
  • The third option, "Providing students with a cash incentive could lead teens to be more motivated and successful," directly relates to the idea of using cash bonuses (the incentive) to achieve a positive outcome (motivation and success) which is relevant to the argument of schools providing cash bonuses for all - A students.

Answer:

Providing students with a cash incentive could lead teens to be more motivated and successful.