even though one book after another repeats this myth, the popularity of spices had nothing to do with…

even though one book after another repeats this myth, the popularity of spices had nothing to do with disguising the taste of meat or fish that had gone bad. any lord who could afford spices (which were expensive) could easily get fresh meat or fish (which were readily available); and when a cook happened to be stuck with rancid food, the spices he had available could not hide the awful smell or taste. whenever they could, people used the spices that were so popular, they became an expensive necessity: pepper, ginger, sugar, sometimes saffron. only the very rich could afford the luxuries - such as ambergris (which is coughed up by whales and offers a strange, perfumy taste of the sea). -sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos\nthe central idea in this passage is that spices were popular because they were flavorful, not because they helped people eat spoiled food. which ideas are key details supporting this? check all that apply.\nspices could not disguise bad meat.\nambergris has a briny, sealike taste.\nfresh meat and fish were easy to find.\nonly the very rich could afford luxuries.\na myth is often repeated in books.

even though one book after another repeats this myth, the popularity of spices had nothing to do with disguising the taste of meat or fish that had gone bad. any lord who could afford spices (which were expensive) could easily get fresh meat or fish (which were readily available); and when a cook happened to be stuck with rancid food, the spices he had available could not hide the awful smell or taste. whenever they could, people used the spices that were so popular, they became an expensive necessity: pepper, ginger, sugar, sometimes saffron. only the very rich could afford the luxuries - such as ambergris (which is coughed up by whales and offers a strange, perfumy taste of the sea). -sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos\nthe central idea in this passage is that spices were popular because they were flavorful, not because they helped people eat spoiled food. which ideas are key details supporting this? check all that apply.\nspices could not disguise bad meat.\nambergris has a briny, sealike taste.\nfresh meat and fish were easy to find.\nonly the very rich could afford luxuries.\na myth is often repeated in books.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The central idea is that spices were popular for flavor, not for disguising spoiled food. "Spices could not disguise bad meat" directly supports this by showing spices' inability to hide bad - taste. "Fresh meat and fish were easy to find" supports it as those who could afford spices could get fresh food, so they didn't need spices for hiding spoiled food. The other options are not relevant to the central idea.

Answer:

Spices could not disguise bad meat. Fresh meat and fish were easy to find.