the events surrounding tinker v. des moines involved a school. which statement best explains why the supreme…

the events surrounding tinker v. des moines involved a school. which statement best explains why the supreme court ruled in the students favor?\no the events involved symbolic speech without disruption.\no the first amendment always applies to issues of speech.\no the events involved controversial issues.\no the protest was an act of civil disobedience.

the events surrounding tinker v. des moines involved a school. which statement best explains why the supreme court ruled in the students favor?\no the events involved symbolic speech without disruption.\no the first amendment always applies to issues of speech.\no the events involved controversial issues.\no the protest was an act of civil disobedience.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam - War. The Supreme Court ruled in their favor because their symbolic speech (wearing armbands) did not disrupt the school environment. The First Amendment protects symbolic speech as long as it doesn't cause substantial disruption.

Answer:

The events involved symbolic speech without disruption.