federalists and anti - federalists debated issues and concerns related to the proposed constitution…
federalists and anti - federalists debated issues and concerns related to the proposed constitution. identify each argument as a federalist or anti - federalist position. the national government holds too much power compared to individual states. the rights of citizens are inherent and do not need to be defined. the rights of citizens should be listed in the constitution. the use of a standing army threatens the liberty of citizens. the protection of national interests requires a standing army.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
- Anti - Federalists were concerned about a strong national government overpowering states, so "The national government holds too much power compared to individual states" is an Anti - Federalist position.
- Federalists generally thought a Bill of Rights was not necessary as rights were inherent, so "The rights of citizens are inherent and do not need to be defined" is a Federalist position.
- Anti - Federalists pushed for a Bill of Rights listing citizens' rights in the Constitution, so "The rights of citizens should be listed in the Constitution" is an Anti - Federalist position.
- Anti - Federalists were wary of a standing army as a threat to liberty, so "The use of a standing army threatens the liberty of citizens" is an Anti - Federalist position.
- Federalists believed in a standing army for national interest protection, so "The protection of national interests requires a standing army" is a Federalist position.
Answer:
- Anti - Federalist
- Federalist
- Anti - Federalist
- Anti - Federalist
- Federalist