why did federalists argue for a separation of powers?\nno single branch of government would have too much…

why did federalists argue for a separation of powers?\nno single branch of government would have too much power.\nthe president should have more power than the other branches.\npower would be divided equally between federal and state government.\ntrying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.

why did federalists argue for a separation of powers?\nno single branch of government would have too much power.\nthe president should have more power than the other branches.\npower would be divided equally between federal and state government.\ntrying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.

Answer

Answer:

No single branch of government would have too much power.

Brief Explanations:

The Federalists aimed to prevent tyranny by ensuring no branch had excessive power through separation of powers. This system checks and balances different branches to safeguard liberty.