which of the following correctly describes the evidential rules governing out - of - court confessions for…

which of the following correctly describes the evidential rules governing out - of - court confessions for state courts in the u.s.?\nall state jurisdictions require that out - of - court confessions be corroborated by additional evidence.\nin some states, if prosecutors prove confessions trustworthy, corroborating evidence is not needed.\nall state jurisdictions accept out - of - court confessions with no corroboration by additional evidence.\nin some states, corroborating evidence is required and must always have the same type and quality.

which of the following correctly describes the evidential rules governing out - of - court confessions for state courts in the u.s.?\nall state jurisdictions require that out - of - court confessions be corroborated by additional evidence.\nin some states, if prosecutors prove confessions trustworthy, corroborating evidence is not needed.\nall state jurisdictions accept out - of - court confessions with no corroboration by additional evidence.\nin some states, corroborating evidence is required and must always have the same type and quality.

Answer

Answer:

B. In some states, if prosecutors prove confessions trustworthy, corroborating evidence is not needed.

Brief Explanations:

In the U.S., state - court rules on out - of - court confessions vary. Some states allow for the admission of out - of - court confessions without corroborating evidence if the prosecution can demonstrate the confession's trustworthiness. Not all states require corroboration, and there is no requirement for corroborating evidence to always be of the same type and quality.