after frank palko was sentenced to death by the state of connecticut, the supreme court ruled that his…

after frank palko was sentenced to death by the state of connecticut, the supreme court ruled that his conviction and execution should be upheld. the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence. his sentence should be reduced. he was the victim of double jeopardy.

after frank palko was sentenced to death by the state of connecticut, the supreme court ruled that his conviction and execution should be upheld. the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence. his sentence should be reduced. he was the victim of double jeopardy.

Answer

Answer:

A. his conviction and execution should be upheld.

Brief Explanations:

In the Palko v. Connecticut case, the Supreme - Court ruled that the Fifth - Amendment's double - jeopardy protection did not apply to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment at that time, thus upholding Palko's conviction and death sentence.