a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a…

a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a \citizen\ within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its \people or citizens.\ consequently, the special rights and immunities guaranteed to citizens do not apply to them. and not being \citizens\ within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. -dred scott v. sandford, supreme court of the united states\nwhich details does taney use as evidence to support his reasoning? check all that apply.\n□ \a free negro of the african race\\n□ \whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves\\n□ \not a citizen within the meaning of the constitution of the united states\\n□ \they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community\\n□ \not numbered among its people or citizens\

a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a \citizen\ within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its \people or citizens.\ consequently, the special rights and immunities guaranteed to citizens do not apply to them. and not being \citizens\ within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. -dred scott v. sandford, supreme court of the united states\nwhich details does taney use as evidence to support his reasoning? check all that apply.\n□ \a free negro of the african race\\n□ \whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves\\n□ \not a citizen within the meaning of the constitution of the united states\\n□ \they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community\\n□ \not numbered among its people or citizens\

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Taney uses details about the historical non - recognition of free negroes of African descent as members of the state community or citizens at the time of the Constitution's adoption as evidence. These details support his reasoning that they are not citizens under the Constitution.

Answer:

"whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves", "they were not regarded in any of the States as members of the community", "not numbered among its 'people or citizens'"