in furman v. georgia (1972), william furman claimed his sentence was appropriate. overly lenient. cruel and…

in furman v. georgia (1972), william furman claimed his sentence was appropriate. overly lenient. cruel and unusual. accidental.

in furman v. georgia (1972), william furman claimed his sentence was appropriate. overly lenient. cruel and unusual. accidental.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

En el caso Furman v. Georgia (1972), William Furman argumentó que su condena era cruel y poco común, lo que implicaba que violaba la Eighth Amendment de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos que prohíbe las sanciones crueles y poco comunes.

Answer:

C. cruel and unusual