in gertz v. robert welch (1974), the supreme court opinion wrote that there is a \social interest in order…

in gertz v. robert welch (1974), the supreme court opinion wrote that there is a \social interest in order and morality\ in preventing false speech. protecting false speech constitutionally may damage this order and morality. a false statement damages both the subject of the falsehood and the listener who hears the false statement. by constitutionally protecting these statements, we protect a persons ability to create disorder.\nthe justice argues that protecting false speech may\nprotect morality.\nprevent disorder.\ndamage order in society.\nharm listeners to speech.

in gertz v. robert welch (1974), the supreme court opinion wrote that there is a \social interest in order and morality\ in preventing false speech. protecting false speech constitutionally may damage this order and morality. a false statement damages both the subject of the falsehood and the listener who hears the false statement. by constitutionally protecting these statements, we protect a persons ability to create disorder.\nthe justice argues that protecting false speech may\nprotect morality.\nprevent disorder.\ndamage order in society.\nharm listeners to speech.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The text states that protecting false speech constitutionally may damage the "order and morality" as it can lead to disorder. It directly mentions that protecting such statements allows for the creation of disorder.

Answer:

damage order in society.