global warming has been proven to be bad for the environment. many scientists agree that if something is not…

global warming has been proven to be bad for the environment. many scientists agree that if something is not done soon, earth is going to be in big trouble. as a society, there is a great deal that we need to do to stop this. the speaker has not provided evidence to support a claim. what would be an appropriate follow - up question? how, specifically, is global warming affecting the environment? why should i care about global warming? isnt global warming just a theory, anyway? why do you care about global warming when there are so many other more important issues?

global warming has been proven to be bad for the environment. many scientists agree that if something is not done soon, earth is going to be in big trouble. as a society, there is a great deal that we need to do to stop this. the speaker has not provided evidence to support a claim. what would be an appropriate follow - up question? how, specifically, is global warming affecting the environment? why should i care about global warming? isnt global warming just a theory, anyway? why do you care about global warming when there are so many other more important issues?

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The original statement claims global - warming is bad for the environment without evidence. An appropriate follow - up should seek evidence on the environmental impact. The first option asks for specific ways global warming affects the environment, which is relevant to getting evidence for the claim. The other options are more about personal concerns or challenging the concept rather than seeking evidence for the environmental impact claim.

Answer:

How, specifically, is global warming affecting the environment?