the government determines what is: \n- offensive\n- excessive\n- irresponsible\n\ntrue\nfalse\n\nquestion…

the government determines what is: \n- offensive\n- excessive\n- irresponsible\n\ntrue\nfalse\n\nquestion 10\n0.4 pts\nwhich line from an advertisement is an example of puffery?\nrunning in these shoes is like floating on a cloud.\nthis automobile won a prestigious safety award four years in a row.\nour new improved formula eliminates trans - fats.\nmore than three billion consumers have eaten our pies.

the government determines what is: \n- offensive\n- excessive\n- irresponsible\n\ntrue\nfalse\n\nquestion 10\n0.4 pts\nwhich line from an advertisement is an example of puffery?\nrunning in these shoes is like floating on a cloud.\nthis automobile won a prestigious safety award four years in a row.\nour new improved formula eliminates trans - fats.\nmore than three billion consumers have eaten our pies.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

For the first question, the government does not have a universal determination of what is offensive, excessive, or irresponsible as these are subjective concepts. For the second question, puffery in advertising is exaggerated, non - literal praise. "Running in these shoes is like floating on a cloud" is an exaggerated and subjective claim, while the other statements are more factual or verifiable.

Answer:

False Running in these shoes is like floating on a cloud.