the government gives public funds to low - performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more…

the government gives public funds to low - performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multidenominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the governments action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools

the government gives public funds to low - performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multidenominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the governments action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion. But if the government's action has a secular purpose, doesn't advance a particular religion, and is not overly entangled with religion, it can be constitutional. Here, the government is giving funds for new - computers to low - performing schools (a secular purpose) and not specifically promoting a religion.

Answer:

as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled