hannah is writing an argument about free speech on the internet. read her claim. the danger is that…

hannah is writing an argument about free speech on the internet. read her claim. the danger is that protection will turn into censorship, eroding our constitutional right to freedom of speech. what reasons can hannah use to support her claim? select two options. the internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear. internet service providers only provide internet access; they have nothing to do with content. social media offer platforms where predators can stalk people and even gain control over them. by refusing to monitor content, we are unleashing criminals such as hate groups and predators. it is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

hannah is writing an argument about free speech on the internet. read her claim. the danger is that protection will turn into censorship, eroding our constitutional right to freedom of speech. what reasons can hannah use to support her claim? select two options. the internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear. internet service providers only provide internet access; they have nothing to do with content. social media offer platforms where predators can stalk people and even gain control over them. by refusing to monitor content, we are unleashing criminals such as hate groups and predators. it is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about free - speech on the internet and the danger of protection turning into censorship. The first option emphasizes the importance of the internet as a free - speech platform, and the fifth option points out the uncertainty of content - judging entities, both of which support the claim. The second option is about ISP's role, the third and fourth options are about negative aspects of non - monitoring related to predators and criminals, which are not directly related to the free - speech and censorship claim.

Answer:

A. The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear. E. It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.