highlight the claim, evidence, and reasoning in the paragraph below.\n\nstate governments should not allow…

highlight the claim, evidence, and reasoning in the paragraph below.\n\nstate governments should not allow residents to water their lawns during droughts. lawn watering is not a basic necessity and requires a lot of water, making this practice a luxury that communities simply cannot afford during a drought. the environmental protection agency reports that, nationwide, \landscape irrigation\ uses up about 9 billion gallons of water each day. during a water shortage, state governments should get involved to put this water to better use serving residents actual needs.

highlight the claim, evidence, and reasoning in the paragraph below.\n\nstate governments should not allow residents to water their lawns during droughts. lawn watering is not a basic necessity and requires a lot of water, making this practice a luxury that communities simply cannot afford during a drought. the environmental protection agency reports that, nationwide, \landscape irrigation\ uses up about 9 billion gallons of water each day. during a water shortage, state governments should get involved to put this water to better use serving residents actual needs.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

El análisis de un argumento requiere identificar la tesis principal (afirmación), los datos objetivos que la sustentan (evidencia) y la conexión lógica entre ambos (razonamiento). En este texto:

  1. Afirmación (Claim): Es la postura del autor. Sostiene que los gobiernos estatales deben prohibir el riego de césped durante las sequías.
  2. Evidencia (Evidence): Son los datos factuales. La Agencia de Protección Ambiental (EPA) reporta que el riego de paisajes consume 9 mil millones de galones de agua al día a nivel nacional.
  3. Razonamiento (Reasoning): Es la justificación lógica. Explica que el riego no es una necesidad básica y consume recursos que las comunidades no pueden permitirse desperdiciar durante una escasez, por lo que el agua debe priorizarse para necesidades reales.

Answer:

Afirmación (Claim): "State governments should not allow residents to water their lawns during droughts."

Evidencia (Evidence): "The Environmental Protection Agency reports that, nationwide, 'landscape irrigation' uses up about 9 billion gallons of water each day."

Razonamiento (Reasoning): "Lawn watering is not a basic necessity and requires a lot of water, making this practice a luxury that communities simply cannot afford during a drought. [...] During a water shortage, state governments should get involved to put this water to better use serving residents' actual needs."