in his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for linda brown claimed that “separate but…

in his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for linda brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools were\nseparate but not truly equal.\nneither equal nor separate.\nequal but not truly separate.\nboth separate and equal.

in his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for linda brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools were\nseparate but not truly equal.\nneither equal nor separate.\nequal but not truly separate.\nboth separate and equal.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for Linda Brown argued that "separate but equal" public - schools were in fact separate but not truly equal, as the segregation itself caused harm and the facilities and opportunities were not actually equal.

Answer:

A. separate but not truly equal