in his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for oliver and linda brown claimed that…

in his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for oliver and linda brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools were\nneither separate nor equal.\nseparate but not truly equal.\nequal but not truly separate.\nboth separate and equal.

in his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for oliver and linda brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools were\nneither separate nor equal.\nseparate but not truly equal.\nequal but not truly separate.\nboth separate and equal.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In the Brown v. Board of Education case, the argument was that while schools were physically separate under the "separate but equal" doctrine, they were not truly equal in terms of resources, opportunities, and educational quality.

Answer:

B. separate but not truly equal.