which of these ideas would supporters of the plessy v. ferguson ruling most likely have agreed with?\nthat…

which of these ideas would supporters of the plessy v. ferguson ruling most likely have agreed with?\nthat \social rights\ were a part of \civil rights\\nthat the constitution should be interpreted without regard to race\nthat \separate but equal\ was a valid legal doctrine\nthat \separate but equal\ did not justify racial segregation

which of these ideas would supporters of the plessy v. ferguson ruling most likely have agreed with?\nthat \social rights\ were a part of \civil rights\\nthat the constitution should be interpreted without regard to race\nthat \separate but equal\ was a valid legal doctrine\nthat \separate but equal\ did not justify racial segregation

Answer

Answer:

that "separate but equal" was a valid legal doctrine

Brief Explanations:

The Plessy v. Ferguson ruling established the "separate but equal" doctrine. Supporters of this ruling would agree with this doctrine. The other options are contrary to the ruling's stance. "Social rights" as part of "civil rights" (not relevant to the ruling's focus on segregation), interpreting the Constitution without regard to race (opposite of the ruling's acceptance of race - based segregation), and "separate but equal" not justifying racial segregation (opposite of the ruling's conclusion) are incorrect.