4. which information best completes the chart? constitutions restrictions on states power to set voting…

4. which information best completes the chart? constitutions restrictions on states power to set voting qualifications no state can deprive a person of the right to vote \on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.\ no state can require payment of a tax as a condition for taking part in the nomination or election of a federal officeholder. no state can deprive a person who is at least 18 years of age of the right to vote on account of age. a. no state may deprive a person of the right to vote who is able to pass a basic literacy test b. no state may deprive a citizen of the right to vote on the basis of gender. c. no state may deprive a person of the right to vote on the basis of where he or she lives. d. no state may permit a citizen to vote unless he or she owns property in that state 5. \the civil rights act of 1964 continued the pattern set in earlier civil rights laws.\ in what way di continue this pattern? a. it depended on judicial action to correct racial inequalities. b. it relied on civil rights protestors to confront racial inequalities. c. it let constitutional amendments address racial inequalities. d. it trusted the president to act in matters of racial inequality.
Answer
Question 4
Brief Explanations:
The chart shows constitutional restrictions on states' voting - qualification powers. The 19th Amendment prohibits gender - based disenfranchisement. Option b aligns with this as it's a constitutional voting - right restriction. Options a (literacy tests were used to disenfranchise, not protected), c (no such constitutional restriction in the common - law sense here), and d (property requirements were abolished earlier and not a restriction in this positive - right - granting sense) are incorrect.
Answer:
b. No State may deprive a citizen of the right to vote on the basis of gender.
Question 5
Brief Explanations:
Earlier civil - rights laws (like those related to school desegregation) often relied on judicial action (e.g., Brown v. Board of Education). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 also used judicial enforcement (e.g., Title II on public accommodations). It didn't mainly rely on protesters (b, though they were important, not the legal - pattern continuation), constitutional amendments (c, the Act was a statute), or the President alone (d, it was a legislative - judicial - executive effort but judicial action was key in continuing the legal pattern).
Answer:
a. It depended on judicial action to correct racial inequalities.