jefferson should move forward with its plan to build storm - water storage tanks underground beneath becker…

jefferson should move forward with its plan to build storm - water storage tanks underground beneath becker boulevard. these tanks will allow sewer overflow during storms to be safely stored until it can be properly treated. currently, sewer overflow runs directly into jefferson bay, where it wreaks havoc on the water quality. this is not only detrimental to fish and other wildlife in the bay, but also causes the water to emit offensive odors. opponents of the plan complain that it will shut down traffic on becker boulevard for several months. but whats a little traffic headache compared to a cleaner environment?\nwhy is the authors response to potential objections inadequate?\n1 it answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.\n2 it does not sufficiently emphasize the environmental benefits of the plan to build underground storm - water storage tanks.\n3 in favoring the environment, the response betrays the authors bias against the communitys use of automobiles.

jefferson should move forward with its plan to build storm - water storage tanks underground beneath becker boulevard. these tanks will allow sewer overflow during storms to be safely stored until it can be properly treated. currently, sewer overflow runs directly into jefferson bay, where it wreaks havoc on the water quality. this is not only detrimental to fish and other wildlife in the bay, but also causes the water to emit offensive odors. opponents of the plan complain that it will shut down traffic on becker boulevard for several months. but whats a little traffic headache compared to a cleaner environment?\nwhy is the authors response to potential objections inadequate?\n1 it answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.\n2 it does not sufficiently emphasize the environmental benefits of the plan to build underground storm - water storage tanks.\n3 in favoring the environment, the response betrays the authors bias against the communitys use of automobiles.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The author responds to the traffic - concern by asking a rhetorical question "But what's a little traffic headache compared to a cleaner environment?" which is dismissive and doesn't actually address the traffic issue in a substantial way.

Answer:

  1. It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.