judicial restraint versus judicial activism\nwhich of these is more characteristic of an activist approach…

judicial restraint versus judicial activism\nwhich of these is more characteristic of an activist approach to judicial review?\na judge overturns a legal precedent.\na judge upholds a lower courts ruling.\na judge makes a decision based on previous rulings.\na judge decides not to hear a case, but lets congress deal with the issue.

judicial restraint versus judicial activism\nwhich of these is more characteristic of an activist approach to judicial review?\na judge overturns a legal precedent.\na judge upholds a lower courts ruling.\na judge makes a decision based on previous rulings.\na judge decides not to hear a case, but lets congress deal with the issue.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Judicial activism involves more intervention and a willingness to change established legal principles. Overturning a legal precedent shows a judge is willing to depart from past decisions, which is characteristic of an activist approach. Upholding a lower - court ruling and basing a decision on previous rulings are more in line with judicial restraint. Letting Congress deal with an issue by not hearing a case is also a restraint - oriented action.

Answer:

A judge overturns a legal precedent.