how does the legal precedent set by the decision in the brown case relate to the concept of federalism?\nthe…

how does the legal precedent set by the decision in the brown case relate to the concept of federalism?\nthe precedent ended discrimination in the united states.\nthe precedent ensured that federal agencies observed the ninth amendment right to equality.\nthe precedent overturned state laws based on an interpretation of the constitution.\nthe precedent amended the constitution.

how does the legal precedent set by the decision in the brown case relate to the concept of federalism?\nthe precedent ended discrimination in the united states.\nthe precedent ensured that federal agencies observed the ninth amendment right to equality.\nthe precedent overturned state laws based on an interpretation of the constitution.\nthe precedent amended the constitution.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

联邦制下州与联邦权力存在平衡。布朗案判决依据对宪法的解释推翻州法律，体现联邦权力对州法律的干预，与联邦制相关。该判决未结束美国歧视，未涉及确保联邦机构遵守第九修正案平等权，也未修正宪法。

Answer:

The precedent overturned state laws based on an interpretation of the Constitution.