what logical evidence do levitt and dubner present in response to the counterclaim that a 7 - 7 wrestler…

what logical evidence do levitt and dubner present in response to the counterclaim that a 7 - 7 wrestler might be more motivated to win and therefore perform better? in the next match, 7 - 7 wrestlers results drop below their predicted percentage. the 7 - 7 wrestlers do well against both 8 - 6 and 9 - 5 opponents. wrestling matches only last a few seconds and are won by a quick exertion of force. wrestlers from the same stable do not oppose one another. this evidence suggests that wrestlers are exhausted after upset victories and lose the following match. might make deals so one wins one match and the other wins the next. typically get a lucky win when they have a record of 7 - 7. do not do as well when they are expected to win as when they are expected to lose.

what logical evidence do levitt and dubner present in response to the counterclaim that a 7 - 7 wrestler might be more motivated to win and therefore perform better? in the next match, 7 - 7 wrestlers results drop below their predicted percentage. the 7 - 7 wrestlers do well against both 8 - 6 and 9 - 5 opponents. wrestling matches only last a few seconds and are won by a quick exertion of force. wrestlers from the same stable do not oppose one another. this evidence suggests that wrestlers are exhausted after upset victories and lose the following match. might make deals so one wins one match and the other wins the next. typically get a lucky win when they have a record of 7 - 7. do not do as well when they are expected to win as when they are expected to lose.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first option presents logical evidence. If a 7 - 7 wrestler was more motivated (as per the counterclaim), their performance in the next match should be better. But the evidence that their results drop below predicted percentage contradicts the idea of increased motivation leading to better performance. The second option about making deals is more of a speculation about behavior rather than direct evidence against the counterclaim. The third option about lucky wins doesn't address the motivation - performance relationship. The fourth option about match duration is irrelevant to the counterclaim. The fifth option about wrestlers from the same stable is also not related to the counterclaim about 7 - 7 wrestlers' motivation and performance.

Answer:

In the next match, 7−7 wrestlers' results drop below their predicted percentage.