many researchers argue that teens today have weaker social skills than teens of the past because they are no…

many researchers argue that teens today have weaker social skills than teens of the past because they are no longer used to communicating face to face. while it may be true that teens have more social interactions per day through electronic devices, some of their conversations are actually more open and meaningful because of technology. with the barrier of technology, people do not fear the immediate reaction they would face if the person were in front of them. in many ways, the ability to communicate from a distance makes people more open and honest than if they were having more face - to - face interactions. which opposing argument does the writer recognize? which fact does the writer use to weaken the opposing argument?
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The opposing argument is that teens have more social interactions per day through electronic devices and some conversations are more open and meaningful due to technology - the barrier of technology makes people less afraid of immediate reactions. The fact used to weaken the opposing argument is not clearly stated in the given text as it seems to support the idea that electronic - based interactions have positive aspects. But if we assume the original view (teens have weaker social skills) as the main stance, the fact that some electronic - based conversations are more open and meaningful could be seen as weakening it.
Answer:
Opposing argument: Teens have more social interactions per day through electronic devices and some conversations are more open and meaningful due to technology. Fact to weaken: Some electronic - based conversations are more open and meaningful.