in mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?\nbanks cannot be created by…

in mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?\nbanks cannot be created by congress.\nstates can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.\na federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.\nbanks may only be created by congress, not by individuals.

in mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?\nbanks cannot be created by congress.\nstates can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.\na federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.\nbanks may only be created by congress, not by individuals.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In McCulloch v. Maryland, Maryland argued that a federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located. This was part of the state - federal power struggle over the creation and regulation of a national bank.

Answer:

A federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.