methods for amending the constitution\n• amendments can be proposed by 2/3 of both houses of congress or by…

methods for amending the constitution\n• amendments can be proposed by 2/3 of both houses of congress or by a national convention requested by 2/3 of the states\n• amendments must be ratified by 3/4 of state legislatures or 3/4 of state conventions called by congress\nbased on this information, the framers would most likely have agreed with which statement?\no the process for changing the constitution should be fast and easy.\no the federal government should control the process for changing the constitution.\no changing constitution should be a common feature of public affairs.\no the constitution should only be changed when absolutely necessary.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The process for amending the Constitution requires a high threshold for both proposal (either 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of states requesting a convention) and ratification (3/4 of state legislatures or state - conventions). This indicates that the Framers intended the Constitution to be changed only when truly necessary. A fast and easy process (first option) is contradicted by the high numerical requirements. The federal government does not solely control the process as states are involved (second option). A common - change feature (third option) is also against the high - threshold nature of the amendment process.
Answer:
The Constitution should only be changed when absolutely necessary.