nate is writing an essay arguing that the football program at his school should be canceled for safety…

nate is writing an essay arguing that the football program at his school should be canceled for safety reasons. which is the most effective claim for his argument? our school should not have a football team because research shows that twenty percent of students will suffer at least one concussion during their high school playing career, which can have dangerous and permanent effects. many people are very proud of our schools football team, and they came close to winning the district title last year, but that doesnt take away from the fact that our high school should not field a football team. football can be a dangerous and risky sport at any level, and other sports, such as basketball and field hockey, are much better choices for students. football is fun and provides students with a sense of unity, but it can also be a dangerous game for many reasons, including the fact that many students suffer concussions while they are playing.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
A strong claim for canceling a football program due to safety should present clear - cut safety - related evidence. The first option provides specific research data about the high percentage of students suffering concussions and the associated dangerous and permanent effects, which directly supports the argument for cancellation. The other options either mention pride in the team, compare with other sports, or mention both positive and negative aspects without emphasizing the safety concern as strongly.
Answer:
Our school should not have a football team because research shows that twenty percent of students will suffer at least one concussion during their high school playing career, which can have dangerous and permanent effects.