in new york v. quarles (1983), the supreme court ruled that miranda rights do not have to be read if a…
in new york v. quarles (1983), the supreme court ruled that miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect already has a criminal record. puts public safety at immediate risk. looks as if he or she has just committed a crime. is someone the arresting officer already knows.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme - Court held that Miranda rights don't need to be read when a suspect puts public safety at immediate risk. This is an exception to the general rule of reading Miranda rights during arrest.
Answer:
B. puts public safety at immediate risk.