in new york v. quarles (1983), the supreme court ruled that miranda rights do not have to be read if a…

in new york v. quarles (1983), the supreme court ruled that miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect\no already has a criminal record.\no puts public safety at immediate risk.\no looks as if he or she has just committed a crime.\no is someone the arresting officer already knows.

in new york v. quarles (1983), the supreme court ruled that miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect\no already has a criminal record.\no puts public safety at immediate risk.\no looks as if he or she has just committed a crime.\no is someone the arresting officer already knows.

Answer

Answer:

B. puts public safety at immediate risk.

Brief Explanations:

In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme - Court created an exception to the Miranda rights requirement when public safety is at immediate risk. This is to allow law - enforcement to act quickly to protect the public without first having to read Miranda rights.