palko v. connecticut and due process\nin the case, the supreme court ruled that due process:\nwas not as…

palko v. connecticut and due process\nin the case, the supreme court ruled that due process:\nwas not as fundamental a right as equal protection.\ncould not be incorporated by the fourteenth amendment.\nallowed the fifth amendment to be applied to state laws.\nshould apply to reversing frank palkas conviction.

palko v. connecticut and due process\nin the case, the supreme court ruled that due process:\nwas not as fundamental a right as equal protection.\ncould not be incorporated by the fourteenth amendment.\nallowed the fifth amendment to be applied to state laws.\nshould apply to reversing frank palkas conviction.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In Palko v. Connecticut, the Supreme - Court held that certain Bill of Rights protections, including aspects of due - process, were not fundamental enough to be incorporated against the states via the Fourteenth Amendment. It did not find due - process to be as fundamental as equal protection in this context. The court ruled that the Fifth - Amendment's double - jeopardy protection (a part of due - process) was not incorporated to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Answer:

B. could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment.