political spending is a form of protected speech under the first amendment, and the government may not keep…

political spending is a form of protected speech under the first amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections. -justice anthony kennedy, opinion of the court, citizens united v. federal elections commission\nwhat did the supreme court decide in the citizens united case?\ncorporations and unions may seek to persuade voters in elections.\ncorporations and unions cannot enter into politics.\nfreedom of speech is restricted to individuals, not corporations or unions.\nthe government cannot regulate freedom of speech.

political spending is a form of protected speech under the first amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections. -justice anthony kennedy, opinion of the court, citizens united v. federal elections commission\nwhat did the supreme court decide in the citizens united case?\ncorporations and unions may seek to persuade voters in elections.\ncorporations and unions cannot enter into politics.\nfreedom of speech is restricted to individuals, not corporations or unions.\nthe government cannot regulate freedom of speech.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

En el caso Citizens United, la Corte Suprema decidió que el gasto político es una forma de expresión protegida por la Primera Enmienda y que el gobierno no puede impedir que corporaciones o sindicatos gasten dinero para apoyar o denunciar a candidatos individuales en elecciones. Esto significa que corporaciones y sindicatos pueden intentar persuadir a los votantes en elecciones.

Answer:

Corporations and unions may seek to persuade voters in elections.