*... this principle is a fundamental one, in all the constitutions of our own states; there is not one of…

*... this principle is a fundamental one, in all the constitutions of our own states; there is not one of them but what is either founded on a declaration or bill of rights, or has certain express reservation of rights interwoven in the body of them. from this it appears, that at a time when the pulse of liberty beat high, and when an appeal was made to the people to form constitutions for the government of themselves, it was their universal sense, that such declarations should make a part of their frames of government. it is, therefore, the more astonishing, that this grand security to the rights of the people is not to be found in this constitution...\n\nbased on what you know and the above excerpt, is this quote from a federalist or anti - federalist?

*... this principle is a fundamental one, in all the constitutions of our own states; there is not one of them but what is either founded on a declaration or bill of rights, or has certain express reservation of rights interwoven in the body of them. from this it appears, that at a time when the pulse of liberty beat high, and when an appeal was made to the people to form constitutions for the government of themselves, it was their universal sense, that such declarations should make a part of their frames of government. it is, therefore, the more astonishing, that this grand security to the rights of the people is not to be found in this constitution...\n\nbased on what you know and the above excerpt, is this quote from a federalist or anti - federalist?

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The quote criticizes the lack of a bill - of - rights or express reservation of rights in a constitution. Anti - Federalists were concerned about the protection of individual rights and often argued for a bill of rights in the US Constitution. Federalists generally thought it was not necessary.

Answer:

ANTI - FEDERALIST