which was a provision of the supreme courts ruling on the scott v. sandford case?\nenslaved people were…

which was a provision of the supreme courts ruling on the scott v. sandford case?\nenslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit.\nfree african americans could enjoy the same rights as other us citizens.\nslaveholders could only take enslaved workers into slave states or territories.\nthe missouri compromise was constitutional and should be upheld.

which was a provision of the supreme courts ruling on the scott v. sandford case?\nenslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit.\nfree african americans could enjoy the same rights as other us citizens.\nslaveholders could only take enslaved workers into slave states or territories.\nthe missouri compromise was constitutional and should be upheld.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In the Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme - Court ruled that enslaved people were property and had no right to file a lawsuit. Free African Americans were not considered US citizens with equal rights. Slaveholders could take enslaved workers into free states or territories, and the Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional.

Answer:

Enslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit.