question 7\naccording to professor friedmans introduction to his book impact, with respect to common law the…

question 7\naccording to professor friedmans introduction to his book impact, with respect to common law the united states:\n○ the united states has never been a common - law country\n○ is still a common - law country where the common law is alive and well\n○ none of these is correct\n○ should no longer be considered a common - law country

question 7\naccording to professor friedmans introduction to his book impact, with respect to common law the united states:\n○ the united states has never been a common - law country\n○ is still a common - law country where the common law is alive and well\n○ none of these is correct\n○ should no longer be considered a common - law country

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To solve this, we recall Professor Friedman's view on US common law. The US inherited common law (from UK), and per his work, the US should no longer be considered a common - law country (the other options are incorrect: it was a common - law country, it's not "alive and well" in the traditional sense as per his view, and "none" is wrong as one option is correct).

Answer:

D. should no longer be considered a common - law country