question 5\n1 pts\nwhen faced with making legal decisions, judges are reluctant to make decisions that…

question 5\n1 pts\nwhen faced with making legal decisions, judges are reluctant to make decisions that contradict earlier judicial decisions. this propensity is an example of the principle of\no stare decisis.\no equality.\no proportionality.\no determinant sentencing.\n\nquestion 6\n1 pts\ntatiana tarasoff was killed by prosenjit poddar, a graduate student at the university of california. tatianas parents sued and the case was heard by the supreme court of california. the tarasoff case is important because\no it gave a legal definition of \dangerousness.\\no it clarified the tax - exempt status of racially segregated colleges.\no it concluded that psychologists could assist in jury selection if they provided their questionnaire responses to the other side.\no it specified that psychotherapists have a duty to use reasonable care to protect identifiable, potential victims from clients in psychotherapy who threaten violence.\n\nquestion 7\n1 pts\nwhich of the following would be an activity conducted by a trial consultant?\no conduct community attitude surveys\no prepare witnesses to testify\no advise lawyers on their presentation strategies\no all of these are correct.

question 5\n1 pts\nwhen faced with making legal decisions, judges are reluctant to make decisions that contradict earlier judicial decisions. this propensity is an example of the principle of\no stare decisis.\no equality.\no proportionality.\no determinant sentencing.\n\nquestion 6\n1 pts\ntatiana tarasoff was killed by prosenjit poddar, a graduate student at the university of california. tatianas parents sued and the case was heard by the supreme court of california. the tarasoff case is important because\no it gave a legal definition of \dangerousness.\\no it clarified the tax - exempt status of racially segregated colleges.\no it concluded that psychologists could assist in jury selection if they provided their questionnaire responses to the other side.\no it specified that psychotherapists have a duty to use reasonable care to protect identifiable, potential victims from clients in psychotherapy who threaten violence.\n\nquestion 7\n1 pts\nwhich of the following would be an activity conducted by a trial consultant?\no conduct community attitude surveys\no prepare witnesses to testify\no advise lawyers on their presentation strategies\no all of these are correct.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • Question 5: Stare decisis is the principle where judges follow earlier judicial decisions. It's why they're reluctant to make contradictory decisions.
  • Question 6: The Tarasoff case is known for specifying that psychotherapists have a duty to protect identifiable potential victims from clients who threaten violence.
  • Question 7: Trial consultants can conduct community - attitude surveys, prepare witnesses to testify, and advise lawyers on presentation strategies.

Answer:

  • Question 5: Stare decisis
  • Question 6: It specified that psychotherapists have a duty to use reasonable care to protect identifiable, potential victims from clients in psychotherapy who threaten violence.
  • Question 7: All of these are correct.