read the claim. citizens of the united states should be required by law to vote in every election. which is…

read the claim. citizens of the united states should be required by law to vote in every election. which is the most likely counter - claim that the opposition will use? the passing of a new law is an interesting and complex process to witness. making people vote will result in uneducated voters who vote randomly. voting makes citizens more engaged in the political events that affect them. citizenship is a privilege that people should respect by doing their civic duty.

read the claim. citizens of the united states should be required by law to vote in every election. which is the most likely counter - claim that the opposition will use? the passing of a new law is an interesting and complex process to witness. making people vote will result in uneducated voters who vote randomly. voting makes citizens more engaged in the political events that affect them. citizenship is a privilege that people should respect by doing their civic duty.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A counter - claim opposes the original claim. The claim is about making voting mandatory. The idea that mandatory voting will lead to uneducated and random voting opposes this by highlighting a negative consequence of the proposed law. The other options either support the idea of voting (voting makes citizens more engaged, citizenship implies civic duty) or are not relevant to the argument against mandatory voting (the process of passing a law).

Answer:

Making people vote will result in uneducated voters who vote randomly.