read the claim and counter - claim. claim: sugary drinks such as soda should be taxed at a higher rate than…

read the claim and counter - claim. claim: sugary drinks such as soda should be taxed at a higher rate than other drinks to discourage people from making unhealthy choices. counter - claim: increasing the price of sugary drinks will not decrease the amount of people who buy and drink them. which is the most effective rebuttal to this counter - claim? studies have shown that if the price of sugary drinks increased by 10 percent, sales would decrease by 10 - 12 percent. people have the right to make their own decisions when it comes to what food and drinks they consume. research has shown that persuading people to make healthier choices is about education, not raising prices to try to force a different choice. although individual choice is important, increasing the price of sugary drinks will have an overall positive effect on our health.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The counter - claim argues that price increase won't reduce consumption. The most effective rebuttal should acknowledge individual choice while showing that price increase has overall health benefits. The first option only shows a sales decrease without addressing the counter - claim's point about people's behavior. The second option supports the counter - claim. The third option goes against the claim. The fourth option acknowledges individual choice but also shows the positive health impact of price increase, effectively rebutting the counter - claim.
Answer:
D. Although individual choice is important, increasing the price of sugary drinks will have an overall positive effect on our health.