read the claim. golf is not a real sport. read the counter - claim. golf is a sport because it requires…

read the claim. golf is not a real sport. read the counter - claim. golf is a sport because it requires strength and coordination. read the rebuttal. people who play golf do some walking, but the us supreme court said that walking is not essential to playing golf. which statement correctly analyzes the rebuttal? it is effective because it creates emphasis by restating the claim. it is effective because it uses a rhetorical device to appeal to logic. it is ineffective because it lacks strong supporting evidence. it is ineffective because it does not point out a flaw in the counter - claim.

read the claim. golf is not a real sport. read the counter - claim. golf is a sport because it requires strength and coordination. read the rebuttal. people who play golf do some walking, but the us supreme court said that walking is not essential to playing golf. which statement correctly analyzes the rebuttal? it is effective because it creates emphasis by restating the claim. it is effective because it uses a rhetorical device to appeal to logic. it is ineffective because it lacks strong supporting evidence. it is ineffective because it does not point out a flaw in the counter - claim.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The rebuttal mentions the US Supreme - Court statement about walking not being essential to golf, but this doesn't address the counter - claim's point about strength and coordination being required for golf. It lacks relevant evidence against the counter - claim.

Answer:

It is ineffective because it lacks strong supporting evidence.