read the claim. golf is not a real sport. read the counterclaim. golf is a sport because it requires…

read the claim. golf is not a real sport. read the counterclaim. golf is a sport because it requires strength and coordination. read the rebuttal. people who play golf do some walking, but the us supreme court said that walking is not essential to playing golf. which statement correctly analyzes the rebuttal? it is effective because it creates emphasis by restating the claim. it is effective because it uses a rhetorical device to appeal to logic. it is ineffective because it lacks strong supporting evidence. it is ineffective because it does not point out a flaw in the counterclaim.

read the claim. golf is not a real sport. read the counterclaim. golf is a sport because it requires strength and coordination. read the rebuttal. people who play golf do some walking, but the us supreme court said that walking is not essential to playing golf. which statement correctly analyzes the rebuttal? it is effective because it creates emphasis by restating the claim. it is effective because it uses a rhetorical device to appeal to logic. it is ineffective because it lacks strong supporting evidence. it is ineffective because it does not point out a flaw in the counterclaim.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The rebuttal about walking not being essential to playing golf has no relation to the counter - claim's point about strength and coordination required for golf. It fails to address the key aspect of the counterclaim.

Answer:

It is ineffective because it does not point out a flaw in the counterclaim.