read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: all cities should implement mandatory composting…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: all cities should implement mandatory composting programs. evidence: composting decreases the amount of food waste that ends up in landfills. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. many cities already have successful mandatory recycling programs. decreasing landfill use is such an important goal that citizens should be required to support it.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: all cities should implement mandatory composting programs. evidence: composting decreases the amount of food waste that ends up in landfills. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. many cities already have successful mandatory recycling programs. decreasing landfill use is such an important goal that citizens should be required to support it.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about implementing mandatory composting programs in cities. The evidence is that composting reduces food - waste in landfills. The second analysis directly links the importance of decreasing landfill use (which composting helps with) to the need for citizens (through mandatory programs) to support this goal. The first analysis about recycling programs is not directly related to the connection between composting and the claim.

Answer:

Decreasing landfill use is such an important goal that citizens should be required to support it.