read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: all cities should implement mandatory composting…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: all cities should implement mandatory composting programs. evidence: composting decreases the amount of food waste that ends up in landfills. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. decreasing landfill use is such an important goal that citizens should be required to support it. many cities already have successful mandatory recycling programs.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: all cities should implement mandatory composting programs. evidence: composting decreases the amount of food waste that ends up in landfills. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. decreasing landfill use is such an important goal that citizens should be required to support it. many cities already have successful mandatory recycling programs.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about mandatory composting programs in cities to reduce landfill - related issues. The first analysis directly links the benefit of composting (reducing landfill waste) to the need for mandatory programs. The second analysis about recycling programs is off - topic as it doesn't directly address the connection between composting and landfill reduction.

Answer:

Decreasing landfill use is such an important goal that citizens should be required to support it.