read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: it is crucial that teenagers not be allowed to drive at…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: it is crucial that teenagers not be allowed to drive at night. evidence: car accidents involving teen drivers are far more likely to occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and midnight. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. laws should protect people from engaging in activities that are likely to result in injury. banning such driving would dramatically reduce harm to teenagers.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: it is crucial that teenagers not be allowed to drive at night. evidence: car accidents involving teen drivers are far more likely to occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and midnight. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. laws should protect people from engaging in activities that are likely to result in injury. banning such driving would dramatically reduce harm to teenagers.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about not allowing teens to drive at night for safety. The first option focuses on laws protecting people from injury - related activities. Since teen - driver accidents are more likely at night, laws restricting night - driving for teens would protect them from injury - prone activities. The second option only mentions reducing harm to teens but doesn't directly link to the idea of laws protecting from injury - causing activities like the first one does.

Answer:

Laws should protect people from engaging in activities that are likely to result in injury.