read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: we should encourage more people to bike to school and…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: we should encourage more people to bike to school and work. evidence: biking to school and work results in less smog in our neighborhoods. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. to gain cleaner air, its worth sacrificing the convenience of cars. if everyone biked to work, we could eliminate smog.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: we should encourage more people to bike to school and work. evidence: biking to school and work results in less smog in our neighborhoods. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. to gain cleaner air, its worth sacrificing the convenience of cars. if everyone biked to work, we could eliminate smog.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about encouraging more people to bike to reduce smog. The first option is a general statement about sacrificing car - convenience for cleaner air. The second option directly links biking (everyone biking) to eliminating smog, which more clearly shows how biking (the action in the claim) leads to the result of less smog (the evidence).

Answer:

If everyone biked to work, we could eliminate smog.