read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: web filters at school should not be too restrictive…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: web filters at school should not be too restrictive. evidence: the majority of students surveyed reported that their schools web filters hindered their ability to perform research. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. research is a crucial part of a students education. students should be allowed to visit and use whatever sites they want.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: web filters at school should not be too restrictive. evidence: the majority of students surveyed reported that their schools web filters hindered their ability to perform research. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. research is a crucial part of a students education. students should be allowed to visit and use whatever sites they want.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about web - filters not being too restrictive in school. The evidence is that web - filters hinder student research. Since research is crucial for education, overly restrictive web - filters that impede it support the claim. The second option is too extreme as it says students can visit any site, which is not the focus of the claim.

Answer:

Research is a crucial part of a student’s education.