read the claim and the supporting evidence.\nclaim: young children benefit from working in…

read the claim and the supporting evidence.\nclaim: young children benefit from working in gardens.\nevidence: studies have shown that children who work in gardens develop an appreciation for nature that extends into adulthood.\nwhy does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection.\na relationship with nature is an essential component of a full life.\nyoung children who work in gardens will spend more time in nature as adults.

read the claim and the supporting evidence.\nclaim: young children benefit from working in gardens.\nevidence: studies have shown that children who work in gardens develop an appreciation for nature that extends into adulthood.\nwhy does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection.\na relationship with nature is an essential component of a full life.\nyoung children who work in gardens will spend more time in nature as adults.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about the benefits for young children from working in gardens. The evidence is that children who work in gardens develop an appreciation for nature that lasts into adulthood. Option A says a relationship with nature is essential for a full life. This ties the appreciation (from the evidence) to a benefit (a full life), directly supporting the claim that young children benefit. Option B just says they'll spend more time in nature as adults, which doesn't clearly show a benefit (the claim is about benefit, not just more time).

Answer:

A. A relationship with nature is an essential component of a full life.