read colins argument. nowadays, one often hears complaints that drones can invade peoples privacy. but this…

read colins argument. nowadays, one often hears complaints that drones can invade peoples privacy. but this is not true. flying drones is actually a sport. it requires coordination and technical skills like other sports. in fact, there should be professional drone - flying leagues. if people recognized this sport, they would no longer complain about where and when drone owners flew their drones. is colins evidence relevant to his claim? yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a sport. yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and flying drones. no, because he only gives his own opinion rather than providing evidence. no, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.

read colins argument. nowadays, one often hears complaints that drones can invade peoples privacy. but this is not true. flying drones is actually a sport. it requires coordination and technical skills like other sports. in fact, there should be professional drone - flying leagues. if people recognized this sport, they would no longer complain about where and when drone owners flew their drones. is colins evidence relevant to his claim? yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a sport. yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and flying drones. no, because he only gives his own opinion rather than providing evidence. no, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Colin's claim is about drones not invading privacy. His evidence focuses on drones being a sport, not on privacy - related aspects. So the evidence is not relevant to the claim.

Answer:

No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.