read the excerpt from brown v board of education\nin each of the cases other than the delaware case, a three…

read the excerpt from brown v board of education\nin each of the cases other than the delaware case, a three - judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the so - called \separate but equal\ doctrine announced by this court in plessy v. ferguson, 163 u.s. 537.\nthe supreme court cites these cases because it seeks to\ndescribe the unique situation in delaware courts.\nillustrate the racial biases of federal court judges.\ncite specific legal rulings in order to generalize.\nshare the unique differences between the given cases.

read the excerpt from brown v board of education\nin each of the cases other than the delaware case, a three - judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the so - called \separate but equal\ doctrine announced by this court in plessy v. ferguson, 163 u.s. 537.\nthe supreme court cites these cases because it seeks to\ndescribe the unique situation in delaware courts.\nillustrate the racial biases of federal court judges.\ncite specific legal rulings in order to generalize.\nshare the unique differences between the given cases.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The Supreme Court cites these cases (like Plessy v. Ferguson) to reference specific legal rulings. By doing so, it can then generalize about the "separate but equal" doctrine's application (or in this case, how lower courts used it to deny relief). It's not about Delaware's uniqueness (as it's the exception), not about racial biases of judges (the text doesn't imply that), and not about sharing unique differences (it's about a common legal principle - "separate but equal").

Answer:

C. cite specific legal rulings in order to generalize.