read the excerpt from monster. petrocelli then he must have lied, is that right? obrien objection. the…

read the excerpt from monster. petrocelli then he must have lied, is that right? obrien objection. the prosecution is soliciting an argument. petrocelli withdrawn. mr. harmon, you say you werent at the drugstore anytime during the day of the robbery. perhaps you would tell us where you were. based on this dialogue, what can the reader infer? this is petrocellis first time acting as the prosecuting attorney in a court of law. mr. harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery. it is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning. petrocelli has not been a trial lawyer as long as obrien has.

read the excerpt from monster. petrocelli then he must have lied, is that right? obrien objection. the prosecution is soliciting an argument. petrocelli withdrawn. mr. harmon, you say you werent at the drugstore anytime during the day of the robbery. perhaps you would tell us where you were. based on this dialogue, what can the reader infer? this is petrocellis first time acting as the prosecuting attorney in a court of law. mr. harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery. it is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning. petrocelli has not been a trial lawyer as long as obrien has.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In the dialogue, Petrocelli questions Mr. Harmon about his whereabouts during the robbery, implying Mr. Harmon knows where he was. There is no evidence about Petrocelli's experience as a prosecutor or the rule about lawyers not arguing during questioning.

Answer:

Mr. Harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery.