read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme courts ruling in plessy v. ferguson.\nif the civil…

read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme courts ruling in plessy v. ferguson.\nif the civil and political rights of both races be equal, one cannot be inferior to the other civilly or politically. if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the united states cannot put them upon the same plane.\nhow does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education?\nthe brown case questions whether separate schools based on race inherently render one inferior to the other.\nthe brown case questions whether educators treat students differently based on their race.\nthe brown case addresses whether separate entrances and water fountains suggest that one race is inferior to another.\nthe brown case addresses whether separate schools hinder the political and intellectual potential of certain citizens.

read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme courts ruling in plessy v. ferguson.\nif the civil and political rights of both races be equal, one cannot be inferior to the other civilly or politically. if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the united states cannot put them upon the same plane.\nhow does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education?\nthe brown case questions whether separate schools based on race inherently render one inferior to the other.\nthe brown case questions whether educators treat students differently based on their race.\nthe brown case addresses whether separate entrances and water fountains suggest that one race is inferior to another.\nthe brown case addresses whether separate schools hinder the political and intellectual potential of certain citizens.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The excerpt from Plessy v. Ferguson is about the idea that if civil and political rights are equal, social inferiority (in the context of the law) shouldn't be imposed. Brown v. Board of Education was centered around the unconstitutionality of racially segregated schools. The key in Brown was whether separate (racially segregated) schools made one race (Black students, as they were segregated) inherently inferior. The first option about "separate schools based on race inherently render one inferior" directly connects to the premise of Brown, as the Court in Brown ruled that "separate but equal" (a doctrine from Plessy) was not valid for schools because separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and made Black students' educational opportunities (and by extension, their social - as education is a social institution - and legal standing in terms of equal rights) inferior. The second option about educators treating students differently is too narrow (it's about the system of segregation, not just educator behavior). The third option about separate entrances and water fountains is more related to Plessy - like segregation in public facilities, not the core of Brown (which was schools). The fourth option about hindering political and intellectual potential is a consequence, but the main premise of Brown was about the inherent inferiority of segregated schools.

Answer:

The Brown case questions whether separate schools based on race inherently render one inferior to the other.